Mark Edwards opines in the Sunday Times about the oft-noted gulf between what music critics regard good music and mass taste. His core argument:
"Music critics are assessing music using different criteria than the rest of the world. Or, perhaps more accurately, we’re using roughly the same criteria, but giving greater weight to some of them. Critics are particularly keen on authenticity, innovation, great lyrics and - most of all - a direct and identifiable connection between the emotions of the songwriter and the finished work. We’re looking for the musical equivalent of a Jackson Pollock - it doesn’t have to be pretty, but it must be genuine. If you take a look at the list of (the criteria used by regular music consumers), you’ll note the almost complete absence of these qualities, in favour of attributes that critics often downweight – melody, entertainment value, immediacy, escapism, image."
I gave up music criticism in favor of reportorial music writing and the other stuff I do in part because I always felt a bit phony setting myself up as more qualified to pass judgement on music than any other knowledgeable fan....